Velociworld

But according to the Romney campaign, if Joe had been in Massachusetts, none of this would have happen, because RomneyCare!

Am I the only one seeing a pattern starting to develop?

Skip, you're the last one to see anything.

Soptic is just your typical union stooge. You only get to see behind the curtain during election cycles, but they are a craven lot who will do anything to keep their hold on power, including elect this Indo-Kenyan minority hire. When the Klan turned bad, these were the guys who ran it.

Perhaps, Casca. Or perhaps you're delusional and paranoid. In either event, that doesn't explain the Romney campaign's invocation of RomneyCare as a defence against the ad. Or Romney's praise of Israel's individual mandate. Or his pioneering one of his own in Massachusetts.

It would be cool for Romney win with a filibuster-proof Republican Senate just for you to learn that these people are playing you for an idiot about repealing and replacing a goddamned thing. The excuses they'll have will be endlessly entertaining.

And you know what? Folks like you will just nod your heads and defend them for blatantly lying to you. Because that's exactly what you did a decade ago.

Skippy, I'm not sure the Romney campaign was wise to make that analogy, but 1) he can't run from RomneyCare, so he'd better embrace it, and 2) the constitution allows states to experiment with such things, while the federal government's powers are strictly enumerated to avoid one-size-fits-all demagoguery.

Besides, what does your point have to do with the fact that the Obama campaign and this guy lied their fucking asses off, amply displaying yet again their thoroughly corrupt nature? That's the goddamn point, and you are being a deliberate twit to avoid the fucking issue at hand. I believe sometimes you lack the courage to face inconvenient truths. But feel free to play "Look! A squirrel!" elsewhere. I won't complain.

Oh, it was an undoubtedly sleazy ad. I didn't feel it necessary to point that out.

But as John Kerry learned the hard way, tripping on your dick in responding kills you more dead than even the original attack does. These things are important, particularly when running against an incumbent president.

By the way, if I'm playing "Look! A squirrel!" so is Ann Coulter, Erick Erickson and about half of the conservative movement. And that's another reason the response is more important than the charge: It reinforces the distrust of Romney from the primaries.

"And that's another reason the response is more important than the charge" bullshit, you would honor lies with a response, when it is clear Obozo and company are liar's, thieves and not the kind of people you would trust with your dog much less a country.

It's important to remember that skippy is a fucking canuck, and therefore only gets to vote for Obama twenty times in Chicago. As for anything else, he bloviates.

For the record, I consider myself more of a Gary Johnson man.

Casca,

It seems to me that you've played this trick on multiple blogs other than my own, where you've pointed out my nationality and suggested that I'm some kind of Obama supporter with no evidence whatsoever.

Amazingly, I don't remember my citizenship being an issue when I spent a year saying that Bush would win in 2004 or when I openly supported McCain for two years in the last cycle.

Should I stay out of your politics? When I hear you whining about Lech Walesa endorsing candidates, I might take it under advisement.

Until then, I'll put my record of predictions and analysis against yours any day of the week, boy. And unlike you, I have a nine-year record of same that's more than easy to check.

James,

Let's see if you hold the same view when said " liar's, thieves and not the kind of people you would trust with your dog much less a country" actually win.

You can ignore a scuzzy attack if you're an already revered figure, like Dwight Eisenhower. But Mitt Romney isn't Ike, and even Ike never faced a 24-hour news cycle, a media that celebrates stupidity, or unlimited money.

Shit, I almost forgot. Eisenhower actually did respond to scuzzy attacks by throwing his hero, George Marshall under the bus and nearly dropping Nixon from the ticket.

I guess you're right then.

Well, now that we've agreed on everything else, let's agree on who's picking up the tab. Anyone holding out with an EBT card? I take those.

Skippy is a delusional Canadian twit who for some strange reason desires to haunt conservative blogs. He lives for the conflict. He is a provocateur. I care not a whit about anything he may ever do, or say, or think. But after the revolution, we'll hang him if he comes down here.

Skippy is a delusional Canadian twit who for some strange reason desires to haunt conservative blogs. He lives for the conflict. He is a provocateur. I care not a whit about anything he may ever do, or say, or think. But after the revolution, we'll hang him if he comes down here.

I guess you're right then. Let's see if you hold the same view when said " liar's, thieves and not the kind of people you would trust with your dog much less a country" actually win. Shit, I almost forgot. Eisenhower actually did respond to scuzzy attacks by throwing his hero, George Marshall under the bus and nearly dropping Nixon from the ticket. You can ignore a scuzzy attack if you're an already revered figure, like Dwight Eisenhower. But Mitt Romney isn't Ike, and even Ike never faced a 24-hour news cycle, a media that celebrates stupidity, or unlimited money. James,

Well, now that we've agreed on everything else, let's agree on who's picking up the tab. Anyone holding out with an EBT card? I take those. You can ignore a scuzzy attack if you're an already revered figure, like Dwight Eisenhower. But Mitt Romney isn't Ike, and even Ike never faced a 24-hour news cycle, a media that celebrates stupidity, or unlimited money. James, Let's see if you hold the same view when said " liar's, thieves and not the kind of people you would trust with your dog much less a country" actually win. Shit, I almost forgot. Eisenhower actually did respond to scuzzy attacks by throwing his hero, George Marshall under the bus and nearly dropping Nixon from the ticket. I guess you're right then.

And you know what? Folks like you will just nod your heads and defend them for blatantly lying to you. Because that's exactly what you did a decade ago. Perhaps, Casca. Or perhaps you're delusional and paranoid. In either event, that doesn't explain the Romney campaign's invocation of RomneyCare as a defence against the ad. Or Romney's praise of Israel's individual mandate. Or his pioneering one of his own in Massachusetts. It would be cool for Romney win with a filibuster-proof Republican Senate just for you to learn that these people are playing you for an idiot about repealing and replacing a goddamned thing. The excuses they'll have will be endlessly entertaining.

I guess you're right then. Let's see if you hold the same view when said " liar's, thieves and not the kind of people you would trust with your dog much less a country" actually win. Shit, I almost forgot. Eisenhower actually did respond to scuzzy attacks by throwing his hero, George Marshall under the bus and nearly dropping Nixon from the ticket. You can ignore a scuzzy attack if you're an already revered figure, like Dwight Eisenhower. But Mitt Romney isn't Ike, and even Ike never faced a 24-hour news cycle, a media that celebrates stupidity, or unlimited money. James,

gbXnP6 I loved your article post.Really thank you! Fantastic.

Thanks a lot for the article.Really thank you! Really Great.

Im obliged for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.