February 4, 2010

All Politicians are Bought

The good ones stay bought.

Although I agree with the majority opinion in the Citizens United Spupreme Court case, I find the reasoning risible. The construct that people may have free speech, that people may also associate freely, and therefore corporations represent free associations that must necessarily also enjoy free speech, is bullshit of the first order.

Corporations are not free associations of people. Now or ever. They are merely for-profit entities, with various peoples associating at will for very limited and specific goals, with vast hierarchical differences. Certainly they are free associations insofar as one may choose to work for a corporation or not, however there is no level playing field inside the shell. The average cubicle dweller or dildo machine punch operator has virtually no say so as to how a publicly-traded corporation disperses its political donations, and to pretend otherwise is a case of reductio ad absurdum.

Here's an example: I worked for almost two decades for a huge old school Southern corporation, formerly headquartered in Richmond, still headquartered in the South. To this day they love to gather customers and senators at their swank West Virginia resort and spa so that they may be served mint juleps by nigras attired in white livery, and have darkies fetch their errant golf shots. That doesn't mean the old PAC monies didn't flow to both sides of the fence. A good 40% of those PAC donations went to leftist ideologues who detested the corporation.

It was fucking insurance, pure and simple. Actually, it was attempted vote-buying, pure and simple. But they just couldn't not give to the cocksuckers on the Commerce, Energy, Transportation, and Appropriations committees who controlled their destiny. My conscientous-objector status to enrollment and participation in the PAC hurt me, too, but I could not give a dime out of my pocket to some of the screwheads they were bribing. What they did with other employees' money and their own profits was beyond my control.

Free association? Sure, if one considers the pimp and whore equal business partners.

I still believe Citizens United was decided correctly, however. I figure if Obama could turn off the verification codes on his donations and reap such sizeable piles of untraceable foreign cash he could afford to forego public money, then everyone else should be able to bankroll a politician, too.

I thought I might essay this concept on a smaller, more personal scale. Say, strike up a conversation with a county commissioner in a bar. Give him some cash, "for the cause." Then send a stripper around a few days later. I'm fairly certain I'd have the gibbering idiot in my pocket in no time. Get five of nine commissioners in your pocket? You're sitting pretty good.

It's not that there's "too much money" in politics, as these asses are wont to say. It's that it's not being focused properly. Or, more importantly, it's not being focused by me. Most politicians can be bought a hell of a lot more cheaply than people think. But not by anonymous internet donors. A bundler, however, can pull together some cash from several sources, none of it his own, by the by, and have that politician all over the snotty end of his fuck stick, if you know what I mean, and unfortunately I think that you do.

Politics is money. Always has been, always will be. And every time the do-gooders try to exorcise it from the body politic, it just gets even seedier. These do-gooders simply fail to remember two critical points:

1. Money makes the world go round

2. There's nothing new under the sun

Posted by Velociman at February 4, 2010 7:14 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Corporations are associations of people who own stock in the corporation. Just because a person might be employed by the company doesn't make him a part of the company. He's hired help.

A stockholder freely chooses to associate with the corporation by the virtue of owning the stock. He's free to sell it at any time. He also has a say in how the company is run.

The help has no say in how the company is run.

Posted by: PawPaw at February 4, 2010 7:59 PM

That's not to say that most politicians aren't prostitutes. Most of them are, and they give prostitution a bad name. The best prostitutes I've known were discreet, well groomed and gave the customer good value for the money. Most politicians more closely resemble a tick.

Posted by: PawPaw at February 4, 2010 8:02 PM

Well, certainly. But virtually all employees are shareholders to some extent, just by virtue of the structuring of their pensions or retirements or 401(k)s. Neither they, nor the outside shareholders, even the larger institutional shareholders, has any real say over how political donations are made. Cast a proxy vote on that issue and wait for management to quake, sir. But don't hold your breathe doing so.

Posted by: Velociman at February 4, 2010 8:08 PM

Citizens United was not anything like the corporation you describe, but only a bunch of conservative activist looking up Hillary's skirt 90 days before an election.
I am a corporation. Eh.
In any case it is a far safer proposition to vastly increase the money in politics than to have our betters ration it.
What McCain Feingold did was remove my right to laugh at Hillary before an election. That's French.

Posted by: james wilson at February 5, 2010 2:08 AM

Crooked politicians and people who buy them are a symptom. The root problem is too much power in government; authority that does not properly belong there. This makes it cost effective to spend big bucks for influence because there's big power. Reduce the power and the value of a politician falls like Monday's stock market.

Posted by: Guaman at February 5, 2010 4:10 AM

Money is politics...doesn't matter if you're running a country or doing a drug deal. Not a lot of difference.

Posted by: Yabu at February 5, 2010 9:22 AM

As pointed out above, it's a common mistake to think that companies are free associations of employees and employers.

The employees are NOT part of the corporation any more than a vendor or a customer. They're not even an asset of the company like a building. They're more like a liability inasmuch as they are an expense.

The corporation consits of the owners freely associating with each other. IF it is an employee-owned company, there is the opportunity to express your opinions on the way the company policies are trending, but no, it is not a straight democracy. People own diferring amounts of the corporation that weight their influence. Owner also hire agents to manage companies, and the 19 year old kid in the stock room simply isn't the one whose advice I would seek on a merger or in lobbying a policy.

As for 401k and pension benefits, that's a better point, but I've never been in a situation where I was forced to invest in stock in the company I worked for in my 401k. That's not even legal due to conflict of interest. In cases where I was offered incentive stock, I was still able to dispose of it at any time of my choosing.

The fact that companies must lobby both sides is simply making sure that the competition's bribes don't get disproportionate influence, and also as pointed out above, the problem with that is not money in politics, but too much power delegated to government. We need to draw bright lines and say "this far and no further" no matter how cute or sad the circumstance of the day may be.

Posted by: thebastidge at February 5, 2010 12:37 PM

"When the legislature controls what is bought and sold the first thing that is bought and sold is legislators." - P.J. O'Rourke

True dat.

Posted by: libsarenavelint at February 8, 2010 4:28 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?