February 22, 2009

Aliens4

I share many citizens' concerns and alarm at the dysfunction wrought by the swarms of illegal aliens that permeate our society, especially because the sheer numbers are unknowable, accountability is nil, assimilation is weak or antithetical to their desires, and the potential for criminal activity is especially high among illegal dwellers. We constantly compare the Mexicans and Latin American illegals to the predominantly European immigrants of the 1840's to 1920's, and fulminate about the ability of these earlier immigrants to assimilate while the Mexicans wallow in the dyspeptic squalor they bring from their homeland. The biggest complainers (rightfully) about illegal entry in general and amnesty in particular are those who are attempting to immigrate legally, and have to wait years in some instances to obtain residency, while amnesty moves the illegals to the front of the line.

Here's something to ponder, however:

The immigrants of earlier days arrived with no notice upon our shores on vessels with abysmal conditions. These unknowns were immediately processed through Ellis Island, and, except for those quarantined for health reasons, were given documents (zee papers) and were allowed to establish residency legally and instantaneously. And although we often tell Mexicans to go fix their own failed state instead of illegally emigrating, we didn't tell the Russian Jews to go fix their own pogroms, or the Irish to go fix their own potato famine, or the Poles to tame their expansionist neighbors. We took it at face value that these were the victims, not the instigators, of their failed societies, and welcomed them as the "wretched refuse of their teeming shores".

Why do illegal aliens not assimilate? Two reasons: first, we force them into underground enclaves, where they merely recreate their native societies, and cherry-pick those few aspects of our society that suit their fancy. Second, we foolishly allow them to use Spanish as a first language, engage in reconquista sedition, and undermine our democractic values because our bureaucrats are in thrall to divisive, misanthropic multiculturalism.

We should set up Ellis Island processing stations on the border, and EZ Pass aliens so that they can work in legal status immediately. Fingerprint, photo, run criminal background checks, and issue the papers. Then we can track them, tax them, and deport them without compunction when they break the law.

Those who've been waiting to legally immigrate should come in first, of course. And once there is a humane, quick entry system in place, we can conscionably institute quotas, and only allow in the numbers we can reasonably accommodate. In today's economic climate that number should probably be zero. And when the quota numbers are lowered, then we can rationally force rank applicants by mastery of English, possession of capital and skills, pre-exisiting family and support networks.

The greatest problem has been our broken bureaucracy, which made legal entry so difficult, expensive, and time-consuming the average Mexican fleeing a failed state rife with corruption, violence, drug murders, kidnapping, and extortion simply weighed his options, and determined he was better off sneaking in and plucking chickens for ten dollars a day. I would, too.

Or we could round them all up and shoot them. I prefer my way, which is likely an indication that I'm going soft in the head, or heart, in my dotage. So be it.

And if I'm incorrect about the earlier Ellis Island process, I'm open to correction. My ancestors came over in the 1700's. All I know from Ellis Island is what I saw in The Godfather, Part 2.

Posted by Velociman at February 22, 2009 7:51 AM | TrackBack
Comments

We should call in the Borg, and Scarface.

Posted by: Sam at February 22, 2009 9:12 AM

When my grandparents came to the U.S., there were no Italian broadcasters, no abundance of italian language newspapers, etc. There was no Internet. It's far too easy today to physically live in one country and mentally and spiritually live on the other side of the globe. I'm not sure how you can really counteract that fact.

Posted by: rob sama at February 22, 2009 10:44 AM

Bravo!

As conservative as I am, I've often thought that when people are willing to hike over miles of blistering desert or cross oceans in crowded, leaky boats just to serve me a slurpee at my local 7-11 or cut my grass, then maybe we should want them here. Not much difference between them and the Pilgrims, or my ancestor from Alsace who came here in the 1840's because he was tired of the French.

Regards.

Posted by: R. Sherman at February 22, 2009 10:44 AM

Yes, but only in the conservative non-misanthropic state, always mindful of Milton Friedman: It's just perfectly obvious that you cannot have both open immigration and a welfare state.

Posted by: james wilson at February 22, 2009 11:37 AM

I've always been curious about the nativist streak in the Republicans who try scoring points by baiting Mexicans. Firstly, it didn't seem to work out all that well in New Mexico, Colorado and Florida in last fall's elections, now did it?


Second, no one seems to have thought out the consequences of it very thoroughly. Let's say that Mitt Romney has super powers in his hairspray that I'm not aware of and could deport all 13 million of them.


I presume that you folks enjoy things like strawberries and clean hotel rooms. All having Americans do those jobs accomplishes is to make those goods and services twice as expensive. Show me someone in Rhode Island that will work for a dollar an hour.


Given the love Americans have for cheap shit, I can't imagine that anyone would be thrilled with a life without illegals.


Not only is all this talk about "tough enforcement" evil and wrong, it's inflationary as fuck. That doesn't seem to be addressed by anyone who isn't me, but that's to be expected since I'm such a cutey-pie.


All of the self-congratulation over building 600 miles of fence on a 2,000 mile border pretty much tells you everything you need to know about most Republicans.


Don't get me started on what your drug war is doing to countries like Mexico and Colombia ....

Posted by: skippystalin at February 22, 2009 11:46 AM

Sigh. I'm trying to take the day off from politics but I like your non-violent solutions to illegals pretty well. Anyway, I'm just making the rounds at long last. Hope you've been well.

I finally have something cheery posted on my blog. A fun meme for photoshoppers.


Posted by: Libby at February 22, 2009 1:42 PM

I like it, on the face of it, but I don't think it will eliminate the influx of line jumpers for this reason: minimum wage. Those cheap strawberries and hotel rooms skippy mentions exist because some people are able to skirt the government imposed minimum wage requirements that artificially increase the cost of running a business. Americans would actually fill those jobs if they paid less, but legally. People entering the work force, people looking for supplemental income ... there's plenty of them, and the current economic crisis may create a new group of Americans willing to be paid lower-than-minimum wage under the table, just for the assurance of having a job.

Posted by: PeggyU at February 22, 2009 1:55 PM

Idle thought ... spend part of the "stimulus" to encourage business growth in Mexico ... reverse the flow of immigration ... lobby the Mexican government to pass business-friendly legislation ... a buck goes further south of the border!

Posted by: PeggyU at February 22, 2009 3:34 PM

Velociman:
"once there is a humane, quick entry system in place, we can conscionably institute quotas, and only allow in the numbers we can reasonably accommodate. In today's economic climate that number should probably be zero."
If we set a number that we can reasonably accommodate, and that number is zero, that sounds like we tell them No, stay home, but the forces that motivate them to come remain in place, with the result that they come anyway. In other words, what is the difference between the situation using your approach and the present situation?

Your earlier points were valid and well said, but I'd say James Wilson's point trumps them.

Posted by: Morenuancedthanyou at February 22, 2009 3:51 PM

Peggy,

Therein lies the rub and that's why most politicians are full of shit. They like to have it both ways, screaming about the supply and doing nothing about the demand. Republicans in particular seem to know nothing about economics.


Like the drug war, the battle against illegal immigration is a prestine example of "supply-side law enforcement." So long as there's a demand for cheap labor, there's always going to a supply. Period. Unless and until the, say, regional district manager for, say, Burger King looks at some serious time in the federal pokey, there's always going be someone with a curious accent asking if you want fries with that.


Blaming impoverished Mexicans for that might make everybody feel better, but it doesn't make anyone any less stupid. Illegal immigrants have produced a lot of things that Americans cherish throughout your history. Those things include, but aren't limited to, Boston, New York City and Elvis Presley


There are few things as adorable as listening to someone rant about the decline of the American middle-class and globalization as they slip on a pair of comfy Nikes that were proudly made by a six year old in Jakarta. As I remember it, even Pat Buchanan had a preference for German cars, didn't he?


Eliminating the minimum wage is fine in theory, but even more, it's a fantastic way to get eaten alive politically. So let's not even pretend that's on the table. Besides, that "lower-than-minimum wage, under the table" job isn't going to pay off anyone's adjustible rate mortage, now is it?


As much as people like scapgoating the illegals, it's important to realize that their kids are not infrequently American citizens. That's why I'm always astonished by the efforts of reactionary retards to cut of their educational and medical benefits. What could go wrong in marginalizing children?


Ending illegal immigration is going to require a number of things that most Americans aren't grown up enough to long tolerate.


First, you're going to have to understand that paying less for a good or service than it's actually worth in the U.S marketplace is always going to drive illegal immigration. Each and every time.


Second, letting American corporations use the Third World as a new-fangled plantation is going to drive the workers there to seek their own little part of the American Dream at your expense. Life is expensive. Deal with it. If you were willing to pay the extra forty bucks for running shoes, they might actually still be made by Americans.


Third, if the drug war wasn't turning a lot of the countries illegals emigrate from into horror stories, they might not have something to flee. That's happening because morons are unable to reconcile themselves to the the fact that Americans really, really like cocaine and deal with it like rational adults.


On the other hand, that would fuck with your prison-industrial complex, but those assholes could get jobs making sneakers.


Those might all sound like lefty-cocksucker talking points, but they all happen to be market-based facts. What's happening is a result of American consumer decisions and the political/law enforcement idea that nothing is the fault of what Americans actually want.


And that's the end of my foreign condesention for today.

Posted by: skippystalin at February 22, 2009 3:51 PM

What happens if I decide to slip across the border to Canada and go to work there without the bother of going through custom, a little stroll across the border.

Posted by: james old guy at February 22, 2009 6:14 PM

James,


You'd probably get federal funding and a Canada Council grant.


Actually, what's happening is that as the fear-mongering gets ratcheted up in the U.S, your illegals aren't going home, they're coming here. This, of course, is doing charming things to the social infrastructure of cities like Windsor.


But we love dealing with your problems. That's why we're here.

Posted by: skippystalin at February 22, 2009 7:29 PM

Lookit. When we lived in Mexico, we weren't allowed to work. We were resident aliens, but no green card for us. They would've thrown us in jail in a heartbeat and left us to rot if they could. Every minor infraction is a chance to hold a U.S. citizen for ransom. It's a fatalistic thugocracy and their denizens do not come here yearning for freedom so much as a free ride.

James' point is exactly correct, but I agree with the relative sanity of making immigration immediate and easy and get these folks adding to the tax rolls.

As it is, the Dems see the Mexicans as their South American niggers, and wish only to keep them in penury and subjugation to the Democratic handout.

Obama Ascendant! is the new Black American Democratic party and the Messicans have no part in it. Obama's crowd will see to it. Don't think so? How many Mexicans are in Chicago? How much has Obama even thrown a nod their way?

Posted by: Joan of Argghh! at February 22, 2009 7:40 PM

Joan,

Of course it's political. And the Democrats are playing the politics better than the Republicans are. The motives are meaningless, as is usually the case in politics.

Bush barely won twice. I happen to think that his cracking 40% of the Hispanic vote had a lot to do with saving us from a Kerry presidency, which would have been a different kind of horrible.


But then the GOP went all bugeyed and stupid over immigration reform and got their asses kicked all over the Southwest, Florida and North Carolina for their trouble. Shit, Georgia was closer than it had any business being. Those states probably aren't coming back anytime soon.


Elections are about addition and the Republican party seemed to think that it could win through subtraction. The results were predictable. Turns out that folks of Hispanic extraction don't cotton to having assholes like Mitt Romney wistlfully opine about forcibly deporting 13 million of their fellows. Who knew?


Your point about Mexicans being the new blacks is a good one, but one that's scary when you think about it. When the Democrats went all civil rightsy in '64, they held black voters, but lost white Southerners. Last year, they won the Hispanic vote and carried whites, including in states they shouldn't have. That might not be a trend, but if I gave a shit, I'd be scared to death that it might be.


Yeah, the Democrats are vicious motherfuckers who want to subjugate everybody. So what? They've finally figured out how to win a presidential election. If Obama's even halfway smart, he'll reintroduce Bush's immigration plan in the spring of 2012 and watch the GOP trip over their own dicks for seven months.

Posted by: skippystalin at February 22, 2009 8:32 PM

Joan is right. For all the focus on white racist behavior, the dirty fact is that, on the whole, other ethnic groups are easily more intolerant of each other than we are of them.

Posted by: PeggyU at February 22, 2009 8:36 PM

BTW, I know there is some language variation, but is condescension really spelled "condesention" in Canada?

Posted by: PeggyU at February 22, 2009 8:39 PM

Peggy,

No. I'm just a very high functioning retard.

Posted by: skippystalin at February 22, 2009 8:43 PM

Well, you know, if all the Mexicans want is a handout better than the Marxist one they had, I think they'll be satified.

However, most Mexicans I knew were very hard-working and clever people with a dream of something more. Those are in Mexico City, still trying to make it work. The ones that stream north are not the brightest and best with any idea of how the First World works. All they know is, "free stuff" is better than no stuff. Thus, they will swarm to the Democrats.

Posted by: Joan of Argghh! at February 22, 2009 8:53 PM

Besides, that "lower-than-minimum wage, under the table" job isn't going to pay off anyone's adjustible rate mortage, now is it?


No, it isn't, and I never said it would. You make the simplistic assumption that all workers require "liveable" wages. Why is it that people assume that the only folks who hold nonskilled jobs have families to feed and that it would be merciless to pay less than a government mandated minimum wage? There are plenty of retired people, young people just entering the work force, and people looking for temporary supplemental income who do these kinds of jobs. Jobs of this sort also allow the developmentally disabled some measure of productivity and pride. It isn't all about working families! And, if there is truly a labor shortage, employers will offer greater compensation to attract help ... or a worker visa program, such as Velociman suggests, could fill the need.

Adjustable rate mortgages ... only make sense in limited circumstances, and certainly can be dangerous to the ignorant. So maybe ask Barney Frank why it's a good idea to make them available to such vulnerable people.

Posted by: PeggyU at February 22, 2009 8:54 PM

.... my least-ancient ancestor on The Continent was on a jury in York Co, SC back in 1755......... all of my other ancestors were here well before then...... but, still, we're all illegals in one way or the other, aren't we?......

....hell, I'm 1/8th indian..... and THEY all got deported a long, long way away back in the 1840s........ so, who knows?......

.... and Skippy, you know you are The Man..... but quit beating down on the denizens....... all visitors are welcome in the South....... and in the South, we're all about being "nice"........ so chill the fuck out.....

..... peace upon you, brother Skippy....... it'll soothe you greatly..... all is well.....

... the World is Fucked Up, we ALL are Fucked Up..... and we'll all deal with it shortly......

Posted by: Eric at February 22, 2009 9:28 PM

Dude, I swear to fucking GOD, if you don't put down the bong, I'm going to smack you!

You've used up our ellipses allotment for the next five fiscal years, and you did it with a single comment!

Not cool, dude. Not. Cool.

Posted by: Randy Rager at February 24, 2009 10:05 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?