I've been trading some friendly banter about religion in public venues with my good friend David at Better Living Through Blogging (that is the next blogmeet I want to make: Montana). We disagree on a few things, but I think our essential skepticism about the invocation of Christian themes in government-sponsored areas is the same. My problem is probably more rooted in irony: I find it repulsive that a Supreme Court can sit silently through an invocation to God Almighty, then rule against little children hearing a prayer in school, or saying "under God" in the Pledge. Hypocritical bastards.
I don't see much harm in religion, at least since the auto-de-fes of the Inquisition, anyway. Nor do I see the bogeyman of the "Religious Right" in the GOP or this Administration. Bush is a religious guy, just like Jimmy Carter, but it seems to be a very private issue with the man. Does it direct his decision making? I'm sure it does. So what? I don't see any references to God and Baptists in No Child Left Behind, or the farm subsidy bill, or steel tariffs, or tax cuts. I'll grant you there may be a little Blue Light in the War on Terror, but we didn't pick that fight. I essentially cleave unto the Descartes principle: Believing is not a problem if God turns out to be false. Not Believing is a real problem if God turns out to be for real. Sort of like pari-mutuel betting, without the porkpie hat, and the tatters of my mortgage payment laying in shreds on the grounds of Los Alamitos.